Difference between revisions of "C2-Blueberry Notes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<pre> AT10m -- Is gap/bad data 3/23/2003 to 4/11/2003 legit? 6999 out 5/23/2004 12:00 to 6/10/2004 19:00 Is gap/bad data 1/26/2008 to 6/13/2008 legit? Is gap/bad data 12/18/2...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===2018=== | ||
| + | * 3m AT/RH | ||
| + | ** 2/23/18 19:00 + sensor funktastic | ||
| + | * super weird duplication of time stamps day 58 2100 (2/27/2018 to 259 1600) just going to delete second fwiw. | ||
| + | * There is another unexplained gap 5/24/2018. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Older Notes==== | ||
| + | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
AT10m -- | AT10m -- | ||
Latest revision as of 14:21, 17 November 2018
2018
- 3m AT/RH
- 2/23/18 19:00 + sensor funktastic
- super weird duplication of time stamps day 58 2100 (2/27/2018 to 259 1600) just going to delete second fwiw.
- There is another unexplained gap 5/24/2018.
Older Notes
AT10m -- Is gap/bad data 3/23/2003 to 4/11/2003 legit? 6999 out 5/23/2004 12:00 to 6/10/2004 19:00 Is gap/bad data 1/26/2008 to 6/13/2008 legit? Is gap/bad data 12/18/2008 to 8/5/2009 legit? Is bad data 12/23/2011 to present legit? AT1m -- Is gap/bad data 3/23/2003 to 4/11/2003 legit? 6999 out 5/23/2004 12:00 to 6/10/2004 19:00 Is bad data 12/23/2011 to 8/6/2012 musk ox? AT3m -- Is gap/bad data 3/23/2003 to 4/11/2003 legit? 6999 out 5/23/2004 15:00 to 6/10/2004 17:00 Is bad data 12/23/2011 to 8/6/2012 musk ox? Battery -- Data gap 3/23/2003 to 4/11/2003 legit? Super Funk 5/23/2004 12:00 to 6/10/2004 19:00 --> could it be a bear? Dead Battery: 1/26/2008 to 6/13/2008 SM10 --
